An employer who expressly prohibits

An employer who expressly prohibits an act will not be liable if an employee commits that Act. However, the employer may be liable if the prohibition can be regarded as applying to the way in which the job is done, rather than to the scope of the job itself. A common situation arising in this area has been that of employees giving lifts to people.

นายจ้างที่ชัดแจ้งห้ามการกระทำที่จะไม่รับผิดชอบหากพนักงานที่มุ่งมั่นที่พระราชบัญญัติ แต่นายจ้างอาจจะต้องรับผิดถ้าห้ามถือได้ว่าเป็นการนำไปใช้ในทางที่งานเสร็จมากกว่าขอบเขตของงานตัวเอง สถานการณ์ทั่วไปที่เกิดขึ้นในพื้นที่นี้ได้รับการที่พนักงานให้ลิฟท์กับคน

Results (English) 1:

An employer who expressly prohibits an act will not be liable if an employee commits that Act. However, the employer may be liable if the prohibition can be regarded as applying to the way in which the job is done, rather than to the scope of the job itself. A common situation arising in this area has been that of employees giving lifts to people.The employer expressly prohibited acts shall not be liable if the employee who committed the Act, but employers may be liable if you do not have to be applied in a way that is more than the scope of the work itself. The general situation that occurs in this area has been an employee, including people.

Results (English) 2:

An employer who expressly prohibits an act will not be liable if an employee commits that Act. However, the employer may be liable if the prohibition can be regarded as applying to the way in which the job is done, rather than to the scope of the. job itself. A common situation arising in this area has been that of employees giving lifts to people. Employers are expressly prohibited actions will not be liable if the employee committed the act. However, employers may be liable if the ban is regarded as applying to the work done over the scope of the job itself. A common scenario that occurs in this area has been on the staff elevator with someone.

Results (English) 3:

An employer who expressly prohibits an act will not be liable if an employee commits that Act. However the employer, may. Be liable if the prohibition can be regarded as applying to the way in which the job, is done rather than to the scope of. The job itself. A common situation arising in this area has been that of employees giving lifts to people.

.The employer that manifest no action to take if employees committed the act But the employer may be liable if the ban can be considered as used in the work is more than the scope of the work myself.