However, the development risks defe

However, the development risks defence dose compare favourably with its counterpart in negligence, the ‘state of the art’ defence laid down in Roe v Minister of Health (1954). Whereas Roe seems to set a minimal standard, in that the defendant’s practices must be no worse than what another person in the same field would do, but need not be as good as the best, the development risks defence, as explained by the ECJ, imposes a much higher standard, requiring producers to be aware of the latest knowledge, provided it is accessible.

อย่างไรก็ตามการพัฒนาความเสี่ยงป้องกันยาที่อยู่ในเกณฑ์ดีเมื่อเปรียบเทียบกับคู่ในความประมาท 'รัฐของศิลปะการป้องกันวางลงในไข่โวลต์รัฐมนตรีว่าการกระทรวงสาธารณสุข (1954) ในขณะที่ไข่ดูเหมือนว่าจะกำหนดมาตรฐานที่น้อยที่สุดในการที่การปฏิบัติของจำเ​​ลยต้องไม่เลวร้ายยิ่งกว่าสิ่งที่คนในสาขาเดียวกันอีกจะทำ แต่ไม่จำเป็นต้องเป็นที่ดีเป็นสิ่งที่ดีที่สุดในการพัฒนาความเสี่ยงการป้องกันตามที่อธิบายไว้โดย ECJ, กำหนดมาตรฐานที่สูงมากต้องผลิตที่จะตระหนักถึงความรู้ล่าสุดให้มันสามารถเข้าถึงได้

Results (English) 1:

However, the development risks defence dose compare favourably with its counterpart in negligence, the 'state of the art' defence laid down in Roe v Minister of Health (1954). Whereas Roe seems to set a minimal standard, in that the defendant's practices must be no worse than what another person in the same field would do, but need not be as good as the best, the development risks defence, as explained by the ECJ, imposes a much higher standard, requiring producers to be aware of the latest knowledge, provided it is accessible.However, the development of risk prevention are drugs when compared with the couple in negligence. ' State-of-the-art protection placed on eggs v Minister of health (1954), while the egg seems to define minimum standards for the conduct of the defendant must not be worse than what people in the field are the same, but it does not need to be as good as the best thing in the development of risk prevention, as described by the ECJ, set a very high standard required to be aware of the latest knowledge and make it accessible.

Results (English) 3:

However the development, risks defence dose compare favourably with its counterpart, in negligence the 'state of the art.' Defence laid down in Roe V Minister of Health (1954). Whereas Roe seems to set a minimal standard in that, the defendant s. ' Practices must be no worse than what another person in the same field would do but need, not be as good as, the best the. Development, risks defenceAs explained by, the ECJ imposes a much higher standard requiring producers, to be aware of the, latest knowledge provided. It is accessible.

.However, the development of preventive medicine at risk were compared to pairs in be careless. 'state of the art block placed in the egg v. Minister of Health (1954).But not as good as the best in the development of the risk prevention, as described by ECJSet high standards to produce to be aware of the latest knowledge to make it accessible.