สามรูปแบบหลักของกลยุทธ์การdownsizin

สามรูปแบบหลักของกลยุทธ์การdownsizingองค์กร ประกอบด้วย การลดจำนวนแรงงาน การออกแบบองค์กร และกลยุทธ์ระบบ

How do organizations implement downsizing?Three forms of implementation strategies have
been identified; workforce reduction, organization redesign, and systemic strategies (Farell &
Mavondo, 2004). First, the workforce reduction
strategy concentrates on the reduction of the
overall number of employees, including layoffs,
retrenchments, natural attritions, early retirements,
hiring freezes, golden parachutes, and buyout
packages. This strategy is commonly implemented
in a reactive manner as a cost-cutting measure
(Ryan & Macky, 1998), yet has shown to be rarely
successful. Second, the organization redesign
strategy focuses on eliminating work and includes
activities, such as abolishing functions, eliminating
hierarchical levels, redesigning tasks, and
consolidating units (Farell & Mavondo, 2004).
Third, the systemic strategy assumes a more
holistic and macro view focusing on changing the
organizationís intrinsic culture and the attitudes and
values of its employees (Luthans & Sommer,
1999). Studies have shown that most firms have
resorted to workforce reduction strategies
The Effects of Downsizing
The adoption of downsizing has profound
financial and human consequences. This has been
covered extensively in the literature. A closer
analysis of the effects that have manifested in the
wake of downsizing presents a complex picture
with the following questions emerging:
ï Is downsizing an effective strategy?
ï Does downsizing lead to improved financial
performance?
ï Have downsized firms been able to reap the
anticipated financial improvements?
Unequivocally, the overall picture of the reported
financial effects of downsizing is bleak. While a
few firms have reported some financial
improvements, the majority of surveyed firms have
been unable to report improved levels of
efficiency, effectiveness, productivity, and
profitability (Sahdev, 2003; Zyglidopoulos, 2003;
Macky, 2004). Table 1 presents a non-exhaustive
overview of some of the main studies carried out
and their respective findings.

&ซอมเมอร์ , 1999 ) มีการศึกษาแสดงให้เห็นว่า บริษัท ส่วนใหญ่มีการใช้กลยุทธ์การลดแรงงาน

Results (English) 1:

The three main styles of organizational downsizing strategy consists of reducing the amount of labor organization and strategy, system design. How do organizations implement downsizing?Three forms of implementation strategies havebeen identified; workforce reduction, organization redesign, and systemic strategies (Farell &Mavondo, 2004). First, the workforce reductionstrategy concentrates on the reduction of theoverall number of employees, including layoffs,retrenchments, natural attritions, early retirements,hiring freezes, golden parachutes, and buyoutpackages. This strategy is commonly implementedin a reactive manner as a cost-cutting measure(Ryan & Macky, 1998), yet has shown to be rarelysuccessful. Second, the organization redesignstrategy focuses on eliminating work and includesactivities, such as abolishing functions, eliminatinghierarchical levels, redesigning tasks, andconsolidating units (Farell & Mavondo, 2004).Third, the systemic strategy assumes a moreholistic and macro view focusing on changing theorganizationís intrinsic culture and the attitudes andvalues of its employees (Luthans & Sommer,1999). Studies have shown that most firms haveresorted to workforce reduction strategiesThe Effects of DownsizingThe adoption of downsizing has profoundfinancial and human consequences. This has beencovered extensively in the literature. A closeranalysis of the effects that have manifested in thewake of downsizing presents a complex picturewith the following questions emerging:ï Is downsizing an effective strategy?ï Does downsizing lead to improved financialperformance?ï Have downsized firms been able to reap theanticipated financial improvements?Unequivocally, the overall picture of the reportedfinancial effects of downsizing is bleak. While afew firms have reported some financialimprovements, the majority of surveyed firms havebeen unable to report improved levels ofefficiency, effectiveness, productivity, andprofitability (Sahdev, 2003; Zyglidopoulos, 2003;Macky, 2004). Table 1 presents a non-exhaustiveoverview of some of the main studies carried outand their respective findings.Fun & Merry, 1999) has shown that most companies have a strategy for reducing labor.

Results (English) 2:

Three main forms of corporate downsizing strategies include reducing the number of workers. Organizational design And strategy system How do organizations IMPLEMENT downsizing? Three Forms of implementation Strategies have been identified; WorkForce Reduction, Organization redesign, and systemic Strategies (Farell & Mavondo, 2,004th). First, the WorkForce Reduction Strategy concentrates on the Reduction of the overall Number of. employees, including layoffs, retrenchments, Natural Attritions, Early retirements, hiring Freezes, Golden parachutes, and buyout Packages. This Strategy is commonly implemented in a reactive Manner as a cost-Cutting measure (Ryan & Macky, the 1998th), yet has shown to. be rarely successful. Second, the Organization redesign Strategy focuses on eliminating Work and includes activities, such as abolishing functions, eliminating hierarchical levels, redesigning Tasks, and consolidating Units (Farell & Mavondo, two thousand and four). Third, the systemic Strategy Assumes a more Holistic. and Macro View focusing on changing the Organizationís intrinsic Culture and the attitudes and values ​​of its employees (Luthans & Sommer, 1999). Studies have shown that Most firms have resorted to WorkForce Reduction Strategies The Effects of Downsizing The Adoption of downsizing has Profound Financial and. Human Consequences. This has been covered extensively in the literature. A closer Analysis of the effects that have manifested in the Wake of downsizing Presents a Complex Picture with the following questions emerging: ï Is downsizing an effective Strategy? ï Does downsizing Lead to improved Financial. Performance? ï Have downsized firms been Able to Reap the anticipated Financial Improvements? unequivocally, the overall Picture of the reported Financial effects of downsizing is Bleak. While a few firms have reported Some Financial Improvements, the majority of surveyed firms have been unable to Report. improved levels of efficiency, effectiveness, Productivity, and profitability (Sahdev, 2003; Zyglidopoulos, the 2,003th; Macky, 2 004). Table 1 Presents a non-exhaustive overview of Some of the Main Studies carried out and their respective findings. & Sommer. North, 1999) Studies have shown that most companies are implementing strategies to reduce labor.

Results (English) 3:

Three main forms of the strategy downsizing organizations include reducing the amount of labor, organization design, and system strategy

How do organizations. Implement downsizing? Three forms of implementation strategies have
been identified; workforce reduction organization redesign,,, And systemic strategies (Farell &
Mavondo 2004). First,,The workforce reduction
strategy concentrates on the reduction of the
overall number, of employees including layoffs
retrenchments,,, Natural, retirements attritions early, hiring freezes
, parachutes and golden, buyout
packages. This strategy is commonly. Implemented
in a reactive manner as a cost-cutting measure
(Ryan, & Macky 1998), yet has shown to be rarely
successful.? Second.The organization redesign
strategy focuses on eliminating work and includes
activities such as, abolishing, functions eliminating
hierarchical. ,, levels redesigning tasks and
consolidating units (Farell, & Mavondo 2004).
Third the systemic, strategy assumes a more
holistic. And macro view focusing on changing the
organization í s intrinsic culture and the attitudes and
.Values of its employees (Luthans, & Sommer
1999). Studies have shown that most firms have
resorted to workforce reduction. Strategies
The Effects of Downsizing
The adoption of downsizing has profound
financial and human consequences. This has. Been
covered extensively in the literature. A closer
analysis of the effects that have manifested in the
wake of downsizing. Presents a complex picture
.With the following questions emerging:
ï Is downsizing an effective strategy?
ï Does downsizing lead to improved financial

, ï performance? Have downsized firms been able to reap the
anticipated financial improvements?
Unequivocally the overall, picture of the. Reported
financial effects of downsizing is bleak. While a
few firms have reported some, financial
improvementsThe majority of surveyed firms have
been unable to report improved levels of
efficiency effectiveness productivity,,, profitability and
. (Sahdev 2003 Zyglidopoulos,;,;, 2003
Macky 2004). Table 1 presents a non-exhaustive
overview of some of the main studies. Carried out
and their respective findings.

, & Sommer