In James’ situation, there are two

In James’ situation, there are two possible options: to sue his father for negligence, to sue Daily Deliveries Ltd (DDL) on the basic of their vicarious liability for his father’s negligence. It will only be worthwhile suing his father if he has some form of insurance on his own behalf. If he has, there is no problem, since as a passenger James was clearly owed a duty of care, which Adrian had fallen below the standard of care and there was damage within the rules of causation and remoteness.

ในสถานการณ์เจมส์มีสองตัวเลือกที่เป็นไปได้ที่จะฟ้องพ่อของเขาที่ประมาท, and ฟ้องDaily Deliveries Ltd (DDL) บนพื้นฐานของความรับผิดตัวแทนของพวกเขาเพราะความประมาทของพ่อของเขา มันคุ้มค่าที่จะได้รับการฟ้องร้องพ่อของเขาถ้าเขามีรูปแบบของการประกันในนามของตัวเองบางส่วน ถ้าเขามีประกันในนามของเขา, มันไม่มีปัญหา เนื่องจากเจมส์เป็นผู้โดยสารอย่างชัดเจน จากการปฏิบัติหน้าที่ในการดูแลรักษาที่เอเดรียได้ลดลงต่ำกว่ามาตรฐานของการดูแลและมีความเสียหายในกฎของสาเหตุและห่างไกล

Results (English) 2:

In James' situation, there are two possible options: to sue his father for negligence, to sue Daily Deliveries Ltd (DDL) on the basic of their vicarious liability for his father's negligence. It will only be worthwhile suing his father if he has some. form of insurance on his own behalf. If he has, there is no problem, since as a passenger James was clearly owed ​​a duty of care, which Adrian had fallen below the standard of care and there was damage within the rules of causation and remoteness. . In that situation, James has two options as possible to sue a negligent father, and sued the Daily Deliveries Ltd (DDL) on the basis of liability represent them because of the negligence of his father. It is worthwhile to get sued his father if he had a form of insurance on behalf of their own parts. If he has insurance on his behalf, it was no problem. James is clearly due to passengers The duty of care that Adrian has fallen below the standard of care, and corruption in the law of cause and distant.

Results (English) 3:

Which Adrian had fallen below the standard of care and there was damage within the rules of causation and remoteness.

in the situation of James has two possible options to sue his father careless,In James', situation there are two possible options: to sue his father for negligence to sue, Daily Deliveries Ltd (DDL). On the basic of their vicarious liability for his father 's negligence. It will only be worthwhile suing his father if he. Has some form of insurance on his own behalf. If he has there is, no problem since as, a passenger James was clearly owed. A duty, of careWhich Adrian had fallen below the standard of care and there was damage within the rules of causation and remoteness.

in the situation of James has two possible options to sue his father careless,And Sue Daily Deliveries Ltd (DDL) on the basis of liability for their representative for negligence of his father. It is worthwhile to have been prosecuted his father if he has the form of insurance on behalf of their own parts. If he have the insurance on his behalf,It's no problem, because James as a passenger. From duty in the care that Adrian has fallen below the standard of care and damage on the rule of cause and far.