If DDL are liable to James, they ma

If DDL are liable to James, they may be covered by the defence of volenti, since James knew that his father was not allowed to take him as a passenger. Therefore, he was taking the risk if there was an accident. However, the provisions of the Road Traffic Act 1988, that mention a person who drives a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty of an offence. For the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above a person is to be regarded as driving dangerously if (and, subject to subsection (2) below,

หาก DDL จะรับผิดชอบกับเจมส์พวกเขาอาจได้รับการคุ้มครองโดยการป้องกันของ Volenti ตั้งแต่เจมส์รู้ว่าพ่อของเขาไม่ได้รับอนุญาตที่จะใช้เขาเป็นผู้โดยสาร ดังนั้นเขาก็รับความเสี่ยงในกรณีที่มีการเกิดอุบัติเหตุ แต่บทบัญญัติของพระราชบัญญัติจราจรทางบกปี 1988 ที่กล่าวถึงบุคคลที่ไดรฟ์รถกลไกขับเคลื่อนอันตรายบนถนนหรือสถานที่สาธารณะอื่น ๆ เป็นความผิดของการกระทำผิดกฎหมาย สำหรับวัตถุประสงค์ของส่วนที่ 1 และ 2 ข้างต้นคนคือการได้รับการยกย่องว่าเป็นขับรถอันตราย ทั้งสองถูกระบุไว้ด้านล่าง

Results (English) 1:

If DDL are liable to James, they may be covered by the defence of volenti, since James knew that his father was not allowed to take him as a passenger. Therefore, he was taking the risk if there was an accident. However, the provisions of the Road Traffic Act 1988, that mention a person who drives a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty of an offence. For the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above a person is to be regarded as driving dangerously if (and, subject to subsection (2) below,If DDL is responsible with James, they may be protected by the defence of Volenti since James knows that his father is not allowed to use them as passengers. Therefore, he is at risk in the event of an accident. However, the provisions of the land traffic Act 1988 that mentioned a person who drives a car powered on road hazard mechanism or other public place is guilty of illegal acts for the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above, the person is recognized as both a dangerous driving is specified below.

Results (English) 3:

If DDL are liable, to James they may be covered by the defence of volenti since James, knew that his father was not allowed. To take him as a passenger. Therefore he was, taking the risk if there was an accident. However the provisions, of the Road. Traffic, Act 1988That mention a person who drives a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty. Of an offence. For the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above a person is to be regarded as driving dangerously if (and subject,, To subsection (2), below

.If DDL will be responsible to James they may be protected by the protection of Volenti since James knows that his father was not allowed to use him as a passenger. So he took the risk in the event of an accident.1988 mentioned individuals drive mechanism driven dangers on the road or other public place is guilty of the offence. For the purpose of the 1 2 above and people are being hailed as the driving is dangerous.