Results (
English) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
If DDL are liable to James, they may be covered by the defence of volenti, since James knew that his father was not allowed to take him as a passenger. Therefore, he was taking the risk if there was an accident. However, the provisions of the Road Traffic Act 1988, that mention a person who drives a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty of an offence. For the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above a person is to be regarded as driving dangerously if (and, subject to subsection (2) below,If DDL is responsible with James, they may be protected by the defence of Volenti since James knows that his father is not allowed to use them as passengers. Therefore, he is at risk in the event of an accident. However, the provisions of the land traffic Act 1988 that mentioned a person who drives a car powered on road hazard mechanism or other public place is guilty of illegal acts for the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above, the person is recognized as both a dangerous driving is specified below.
Being translated, please wait..
