Results (
English) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
minance of qualitative research, we investigated its data analysis methods, ie, its coding (see Fig. 9). 39% of papers did not code data systematically or explain their coding; 35% clearly did; whilst the remaining 26% gave limited detail for some data. When trends were examined, a more positive picture emerged-papers with clearly or somewhat coded data consistently increased, whilst those not coded decreased. This suggests more stringent requirements by referees regarding data analysis, or possibly the popularity of quali- tative analytical softwares, such as NVivo, that facilitate systematic coding.
Being translated, please wait..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce48f/ce48f249138547446af6a8be2678a33941a77385" alt=""