Results (
English) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
Therefore, this report agrees with Juliet Bourke that the use of flexibility has moved away from its original paradigm towards new horizons, and specific profits of employers, that change could be avoided. However, it has advantages and disadvantages associated with it, if there is a good deal may lead to an effective work life balance of workersFlexibility and balance work-life program is beneficial to both the employers and the employees. Contributes to the benefit of both employers and employees has the potential to improve It. employee morale and Reduce absenteeism retain corporate knowledge., especially during the economic downturn; however, the aim of flexibility in lowering costs they sometimes can cause a negative effect on the organization and the employee work life balance programs and the flexibility to benefit the employer and employee. However, this flexibility has been moved from its original format. Which the employer can benefit from the flexibility of the Shifted. But at the same time, the negative impact was an employee. However, Flex can be a lot of negative consequences if the leave the employee has to work long hours too. This will affect both employees and the organization. Managers will be required to participate in the planning and operation of the employees to achieve the goals of the organization. But at the same time, they must take care of welfare. The work of the employee. In addition, Flex, especially during an economic downturn. The employer has the flexibility to reduce costs and increase revenue to which the employer, each ก้จะมี the deployment flexibility to work differently, such as Virgin Australia. Kop serve by staffing flexibility and reducing the number of employees to reduce costs, while KPMG. There is a deployment flexibility by reducing the number of working hours of employees.
Being translated, please wait..
