Finally, consider Frida’s potential

Finally, consider Frida’s potential claim with regard to the cake, whether a seller will be considered negligent will depend on whether it was reasonable to expect them to examine the cake for fault, or warn of any possible risks. It was emphasized that the defect would have been very easy for the seller to discover, whereas, for example, a cake retailer would not be expected to check the hardness or soft of cake. However, be expected to make sure that Frida buys the cake from a reputable supplier and to store it correctly. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 is unlikely to apply, because the cake was not sold in the course of a business.

สุดท้ายพิจารณาข้อเรียกร้องที่มีศักยภาพของฟรีด้าเกี่ยวกับเค้กไม่ว่าจะเป็นผู้ขายจะถือว่าประมาทจะขึ้นอยู่กับว่ามันเป็นเหตุผลที่จะคาดหวังให้ตรวจสอบความผิดเค้กหรือเตือนความเสี่ยงที่เป็นไปได้ มันได้รับการเน้นย้ำว่าข้อบกพร่องที่จะได้รับง่ายมากสำหรับผู้ขายที่จะค้นพบในขณะที่ตัวอย่างเช่นร้านค้าปลีกเค้กจะไม่ได้คาดหวังที่จะตรวจสอบความแข็งหรือนุ่มของเค้ก อย่างไรก็ตามคาดว่าจะให้แน่ใจว่า Frida ซื้อเค้กจากผู้ผลิตที่มีชื่อเสียงและการจัดเก็บอย่างถูกต้อง พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค 1987 ไม่น่าจะนำไปใช้เพราะเค้กที่ไม่ได้ขายในการดำเนินธุรกิจ

Results (English) 2:

Finally, consider Frida's potential claim with regard to the cake, whether a seller will be considered negligent will depend on whether it was reasonable to expect them to examine the cake for fault, or warn of any possible risks. It was emphasized that the defect would. have been very easy for the seller to discover, whereas, for example, a cake retailer would not be expected to check the hardness or soft of cake. However, be expected to make sure that Frida buys the cake from a reputable supplier and to store. it correctly. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 is unlikely to apply, because the cake was not sold in the course of a business. Finally, consider the demands of potential Frida on the cake, whether the seller would be reckless to. depending on whether it is reasonable to expect them to detect any cake or warn of possible risks. It has been emphasized that the defects will be much easier for vendors to discover, for example, while retailers cake is not expected to determine the hardness or softness of the cake. However, expect to ensure Frida bought a cake from a reputable manufacturer and stored correctly. Consumer Protection Act of 1987 is unlikely to be used because the cake is not sold on the business.

Results (English) 3:

Finally consider Frida ', s potential claim with regard to, the cake whether a seller will be considered negligent will depend. On whether it was reasonable to expect them to examine the cake for fault or warn, of any possible risks. It was emphasized. That the defect would have been very easy for the seller to discover whereas for example,,,A cake retailer would not be expected to check the hardness or soft of cake. However be expected, to make sure that Frida. Buys the cake from a reputable supplier and to store it correctly. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 is unlikely, to apply. Because the cake was not sold in the course of a business.

.Finally, considering the potential demands of Frida about cakes such as sellers are considered careless will depend on whether it is a reason to expect check cake or fault warning risk as possible.However, expect to make sure Frida buying from a reputable manufacturer and stored properly. Consumer Protection Act 1987 shouldn't be used because the cake didn't sell in the business.