Beginning, with the radio, the impo

Beginning, with the radio, the important issues here is that the product is defective, but as far as know that he finds the radio does not work, that it is not dangerous enough. As a result, the only claim is in contract. Benny has no contract with the retailer, since Frida bought the ratio, so whether he can claim as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

เริ่มต้นด้วยวิทยุประเด็นที่สำคัญที่นี่คือผลิตภัณฑ์ที่เป็นข้อบกพร่อง แต่เท่าที่รู้ว่าเขาพบว่าวิทยุไม่ทำงานว่ามันจะไม่เป็นอันตรายพอ เป็นผลให้การเรียกร้องเพียงอย่างเดียวคือในสัญญา เบนนี่มีการทำสัญญากับผู้ค้าปลีกไม่ได้เนื่องจาก Frida ซื้ออัตราส่วนดังนั้นไม่ว่าเขาสามารถอ้างว่าเป็นผลมาจากสัญญา (สิทธิของบุคคลที่สาม) ปี 1999

Results (English) 1:

Beginning, with the radio, the important issues here is that the product is defective, but as far as know that he finds the radio does not work, that it is not dangerous enough. As a result, the only claim is in contract. Benny has no contract with the retailer, since Frida bought the ratio, so whether he can claim as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.Start with the most important issue to radio here is a product that is defective, but as far as I know, he found that the radio does not work it is harmless enough, as a result, the only claim is in contract. Benny has a contract with retailers not because it purchased Frida ratio so that he can claim that as a result of the contracts (rights of third parties) 1999.

Results (English) 2:

Beginning, with the radio, the important issues here is that the product is defective, but as far as know that he finds the radio does not work, that it is not dangerous enough. As a result, the only claim is in contract. Benny. has no contract with the retailer, since Frida bought the ratio, so whether he can claim as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Starting with the radio issues important here is that the product is defective. But as you know, he found that the radio does not work, it is not dangerous enough. As a result, the claim alone is in the contract. Benny has a contract with the retailer, not because Frida buy ratio so that he can claim that as a result of the agreement. (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

Results (English) 3:

Beginning with radio, the, important the issues here is that the product is defective but as, far as know that he finds. The radio does, not work that it is not dangerous enough. As a result the only, claim is in contract. Benny has no contract. With the retailer since Frida, bought the ratio so whether, he can claim as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties). Act 1999.

.Start with the radio important issue here is that a product defect. But as far as I know, he found the radio doesn't work that it is harmless enough. As a result, the claim is only in the contract.Frida purchase ratio so whether he can claim as a result of the contracts (rights of a third party) years 1999.