the anaesthetic had been contaminat

the anaesthetic had been contaminated with a sterilising fluid. This resulted in both claimants becoming permanently paralysed. The anaesthetic had become contaminated during storage. The anaesthetic was stored in glass ampoules which were emerged in the sterilising fluid. It transpired the ampoules had minute cracks which were not detectable with human eye. At the time it was not known that the anaesthetic could be contaminated in this way and the hospital followed a normal procedure in storing them this way (e-lawresources, 2015). There was no breach of duty. The risk was not foreseeable as it was an unknown risk at the time. This is the action that gives Benny the chance of success.

ยาชามีการปนเปื้อนกับน้ำฆ่าเชื้อ ส่งผลให้ทั้งสองก็ได้กลายเป็นอัมพาตถาวร ยาชาได้กลายเป็นสิ่งที่มีการปนเปื้อนระหว่างการเก็บรักษา ยาชาที่ถูกเก็บไว้ในหลอดแก้วซึ่งได้โผล่ออกมาในน้ำฆ่าเชื้อ มัน transpired หลอดมีรอยแตกและไม่สามารถตรวจพบได้ด้วยตามนุษย์ ในขณะที่มันก็ไม่ได้รู้จักกันว่ายาชาที่อาจจะปนเปื้อนในลักษณะนี้และโรงพยาบาลตามขั้นตอนปกติในการจัดเก็บของพวกเขาด้วยวิธีนี้ (e-lawresources 2015) มีการละเมิดที่ไม่ได้ปฏิบัติหน้าที่ ความเสี่ยงที่ไม่สามารถคาดการณ์ได้อย่างที่มันเป็นความเสี่ยงที่ไม่รู้จักในเวลา นี่คือการกระทำที่จะช่วยให้เบนนี่โอกาสประสบความสำเร็จ

Results (English) 1:

the anaesthetic had been contaminated with a sterilising fluid. This resulted in both claimants becoming permanently paralysed. The anaesthetic had become contaminated during storage. The anaesthetic was stored in glass ampoules which were emerged in the sterilising fluid. It transpired the ampoules had minute cracks which were not detectable with human eye. At the time it was not known that the anaesthetic could be contaminated in this way and the hospital followed a normal procedure in storing them this way (e-lawresources, 2015). There was no breach of duty. The risk was not foreseeable as it was an unknown risk at the time. This is the action that gives Benny the chance of success.Anesthesia has been contaminated with water disinfection. As a result, both have become permanent paralysis. Anesthesia has become something that has been contaminated during storage. The anesthetic was kept in a glass tube, which can pop out in water disinfection, it tube transpired has cracks and it cannot be detected by the human eye. While it is not known whether the anesthetic may be contaminated in this manner, and the normal procedures in hospital to their storage in this way (e-lawresources 2015) has been violated, that their risks are not able to predict is that it is an unknown risk at the time. This is an action that gives Benny a chance to succeed.

Results (English) 2:

the anaesthetic had been contaminated with a sterilising fluid. This resulted in both claimants becoming permanently paralysed. The anaesthetic had become contaminated during storage. The anaesthetic was stored in glass ampoules which were emerged in the sterilising fluid. It transpired the ampoules had minute cracks which. were not detectable with human eye. At the time it was not known that the anaesthetic could be contaminated in this way and the hospital followed a normal procedure in storing them this way (e-lawresources, 2015). There was no breach of duty. The risk was not foreseeable as it was an unknown risk at the time. This is the action that gives Benny the chance of success. anesthetics have been contaminated with water disinfection. As a result, it has become paralyzed permanently. Cocaine has become something of contamination during storage. Anesthesia was kept in a glass tube, which has emerged in a sterile tube, it transpired cracks and can not be detected by the human eye. While it was not known that the anesthetic that may be contaminated in this way, and hospitals as normal procedure to store them this way. (E-lawresources 2015) is not a violation of duty. The risk that can not be predicted, it is unknown at risk. This is done to help Benny chance of success.

Results (English) 3:

The anaesthetic had been contaminated with a sterilising fluid. This resulted in both claimants becoming permanently, paralysed. The anaesthetic had become contaminated during storage. The anaesthetic was stored in glass ampoules which were emerged. In the sterilising fluid. It transpired the ampoules had minute cracks which were not detectable with human eye.At the time it was not known that the anaesthetic could be contaminated in this way and the hospital followed a normal. Procedure in storing them this, way (e-lawresources 2015). There was no breach of duty. The risk was not foreseeable as. It was an unknown risk at the time. This is the action that gives Benny the chance of success.

.Anesthesia is contaminated with water disinfection. Resulting in both became permanent paralysis Anesthesia has become something of a contamination during storage. Anesthesia was kept in the glass tube, which has emerged in water disinfection. It transpired.While it's not known that anesthesia could be contaminated in this manner and the hospital according to normal procedure to store them this way. (e-lawresources 2015) violations not on duty.This is an act to help Ben's chance of success!