Whether the fact, he was on their l

Whether the fact, he was on their lunch break might make a difference. In the case of Storey v Ashton (1869), some employees had finished delivering wine for their employers and were on their way back after their official work hours were over. They decided to take a detour to visit a relation of one of the employees. On the way there they negligently ran over the claimant. His attempt to sue their employer failed as they were treated as being on a ‘new and independent journey’ from their work trip at the time of the accident.

ไม่ว่าจะเป็นความจริงที่เขาเป็นในช่วงพักกลางวันของพวกเขาอาจสร้างความแตกต่าง ในกรณีของStorey v Ashton (1869), พนักงานบางส่วนได้เสร็จสิ้นการส่งมอบไวน์สำหรับนายจ้างของพวกเขาและอยู่บนทางของพวกเขากลับมาหลังจากที่ชั่วโมงการทำงานของพวกเขาอย่างเป็นทางการมากกว่า พวกเขาตัดสินใจที่จะอ้อมไปเยี่ยมชมความสัมพันธ์ของหนึ่งในพนักงาน เกี่ยวกับวิธีการที่พวกเขามีประมาทเลินเล่อวิ่งไปเรียกร้อง ความพยายามที่จะฟ้องนายจ้างของเขาล้มเหลวที่พวกเขาได้รับการปฏิบัติในฐานะที่เป็น 'การเดินทางครั้งใหม่และเป็นอิสระจากการเดินทาง' จากการทำงานของพวกเขาในเวลาที่เกิดอุบัติเหตุ

Results (English) 1:

Whether the fact, he was on their lunch break might make a difference. In the case of Storey v Ashton (1869), some employees had finished delivering wine for their employers and were on their way back after their official work hours were over. They decided to take a detour to visit a relation of one of the employees. On the way there they negligently ran over the claimant. His attempt to sue their employer failed as they were treated as being on a 'new and independent journey' from their work trip at the time of the accident.Whether it is true that he is during the day and they can make a difference. In the case of Ashton v Storey (1869), Some employees have completed the delivery of wine for their employer and are on their way back after their working hours more than the official. They decided to visit the relationship of one of the employees about how they are going to rush to the loenloe call. An attempt to sue his employer failed, they were treated as ' a new journey and travel independently. From their work at the time the accident occurred.

Results (English) 3:

Whether, the fact he was on their lunch break might make a difference. In the case of Storey V Ashton (1869), some employees. Had finished delivering wine for their employers and were on their way back after their official work hours were over. They. Decided to take a detour to visit a relation of one of the employees. On the way there they negligently ran over the claimant.His attempt to sue their employer failed as they were treated as being on a 'new and independent journey from their work.' Trip at the time of the accident.

, whether it is true that he is during the lunch break of them may make a difference in the case of Storey. V Ashton (1869),Some employees have completed delivery of wine for their employer, and on their way back after working hours of them officially.On the way they have negligence run claim. An attempt to sue his employer failed, they are treated as 'a new journey and independently of the journey'.