It is also worth pointing out that

It is also worth pointing out that he may also be able to being an action in contract, if the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 applies, and this may be advantageous since it does not require proof of fault. Whether the 1999 Act applies when looking at the issue of the ratio, it is quite sufficient to say that if, on the rules that Benny is the consumer so he can claim that as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, the Act does apply, Benny will have a claim, and if it does not apply, he will not.

นอกจากนี้ยังชี้ให้เห็นว่าเขายังอาจจะสามารถที่จะเป็นดำเนินการในการทำสัญญา ถ้าสัญญา (สิทธิของบุคคลที่สาม) ปี 1999 มีผลบังคับใช้และนี่อาจจะเป็นประโยชน์เพราะมันไม่จำเป็นต้องพิสูจน์ความผิด ไม่ว่าจะเป็นปี 1999 มีผลบังคับใช้เมื่อมองไปที่ปัญหาของอัตราส่วนมันค่อนข้างเพียงพอที่จะบอกว่าถ้าในกฎที่เบนนี่คือผู้บริโภคเพื่อให้เขาสามารถอ้างว่าเป็นผลมาจากสัญญา (สิทธิของบุคคลที่สาม) ปี 1999 พระราชบัญญัติ เบนนี่จะมีการเรียกร้องและถ้ามันใช้ไม่ได้ที่เขาจะไม่สามารถร้องเรียนได้

Results (English) 1:

It is also worth pointing out that he may also be able to being an action in contract, if the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 applies, and this may be advantageous since it does not require proof of fault. Whether the 1999 Act applies when looking at the issue of the ratio, it is quite sufficient to say that if, on the rules that Benny is the consumer so he can claim that as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, the Act does apply, Benny will have a claim, and if it does not apply, he will not.It also suggests that he may also be able to be performed in the Contracting. If the contract (rights of third parties) 1999 is valid and this may be useful because it does not need to prove guilt. Whether it's the year 1999 is valid when it looks at the issue of the ratio it is quite enough to say that if the rule that Benny is a consumer so that he can claim that as a result of the contracts (rights of third parties) Act 1999. Benny has a claim and, if it does not work, he will not be able to claim.

Results (English) 2:

It is also worth pointing out that he may also be able to being an action in contract, if the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 applies, and this may be advantageous since it does not require proof of fault. Whether the 1999 Act. applies when looking at the issue of the ratio, it is quite sufficient to say that if, on the rules that Benny is the consumer so he can claim that as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, the Act does. apply, Benny will have a claim, and if it does not apply, he will not. It also indicated that he might still be able to perform the contract if the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) years. Effective in 1999, and this could be helpful because it does not require proof of fault. Whether 1999 is effective when looking at the issue of ratios, it is sufficient to say that if the rule is that consumers Benny so he can claim that as a result of the agreement. (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Benny would have a claim, and if it does not, he can not complain.

Results (English) 3:

It is also worth pointing out that he may also be able to being an action, in contract if the Contract (Rights of Third. Parties), Act 1999 applies and this may be advantageous since it does not require proof of fault. Whether the 1999 Act applies. When looking at the issue of, the ratio it is quite sufficient to say, that ifOn the rules that Benny is the consumer so he can claim that as a result of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties), Act 1999 the. Act does apply Benny will, have a claim and if, it does not apply he will, not.

.It also pointed out that he might still be able to be performed in a contract. If the contracts (rights of a third party) years 1999 is mandatory, and this might be useful, because it need not proven guilty. A year 1999.(the rights of a third party) years 1999 act. Benny be demanding and if it is not, he will not be able to complain.