A claimant claiming breach of contr

A claimant claiming breach of contract does not need to prove that the product was defective because of something that the seller did or failed to do; in other words, Frida no need to prove fault.

โจทก์อ้างว่าผิดสัญญาไม่จำเป็นต้องพิสูจน์ว่าผลิตภัณฑ์ที่เป็นข้อบกพร่องเพราะสิ่งที่ผู้ขายไม่ได้หรือล้มเหลวที่จะทำ; ในคำอื่นๆ ที่ฟรีด้าไม่ต้องพิสูจน์ข้อบกพร่อง

Results (English) 1:

A claimant claiming breach of contract does not need to prove that the product was defective because of something that the seller did or failed to do; in other words, Frida no need to prove fault.The plaintiff claims that the contract was not necessary to prove that the product is defective, because what the seller does not have or fail to do; in other words, that it is free of charge to prove fault.

Results (English) 2:

A claimant claiming breach of contract does not need to prove that the product was defective because of something that the seller did or failed to do; in other words, Frida no need to prove fault. The plaintiffs claimed that the contract does not require proof that the products. is defective because the seller does not or fails to do so; In other words, Frida does not have to prove fault.

Results (English) 3:

A claimant claiming breach of contract does not need to prove that the product was defective because of something that. The seller did or failed to do; in, other words Frida no need to prove fault.

.The plaintiff claimed breach of contract don't have to prove that the product is defective because of what he can't sell or failed to do; in other words, The Frida don't prove defects.