Results (
English) 2:
[Copy]Copied!
From table to calculate the correlation between the variables that variable reliability is positively correlated with the tangible variables are statistically significant at Nice. 01 (sig <.01), a significant. Pearson correlation equal. 367. Variable in the oven with Expansive Relationship trailers variables positively to what factors have a statistically significant 0.5 (sig <.05), with a correlation coefficient of Pearson. 268. Its oiling is negatively correlated with variables that capture the very Minas statistically significant at 0.5 (sig <0.5), with a correlation coefficient of Pearson. -0.290
reliability variables are positively correlated with the variable reliability level of statistical significance. 05 (sig <.05), with a correlation coefficient of Pearson. -300. The parameters of the heart, there is a positive relationship with a significant factor of course, has a statistically significant level. 05 (sig <.05), with a correlation coefficient of Pearson. 321 of the variable. most reliable are positively correlated with the quality of service of all employees at the level of statistical significance. 01 (sig <.01), with a Pearson correlation coefficient equal. 559 variables liability. is positively correlated with the quality of service of employees at all levels of statistical significance. 01 (sig <.01), with a Pearson correlation coefficient equal. 522 variables with certainty the relationship. add positively to the quality of services of the entire staff at a statistically significant level. 01 (sig <.01), with a Pearson correlation coefficient equal. 376, only factors in favor of no relationship. The Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.068 in terms of customer satisfaction in the quality of service of TOPSHOP showed no correlation with the variable quality of service in any of the employees in the store.
Being translated, please wait..
![](//wwwimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)