Therefore, this report agrees with

Therefore, this report agrees with Juliet Bourke that the use of flexibility has moved away from its original paradigm towards new horizons, and specific profits of employers, that change could be avoided. However, it has advantages and disadvantages associated with it, if there is a good deal may lead to an effective work life balance of workers

Flexibility and work-life balance program ให้ประโยชน์แก่นายจ้างและพนักงาน อย่างไรก็ดีflexibilityได้ย้ายไปจากรูปแบบเดิม ซึ่งนายจ้างสามารถได้ประโยชน์จากการShiftedของflexibility แต่ในขณะเดียวกันได้ส่งผลกระทบด้านลบแแก่พนักงาน อย่างไรก็ตามการทำงานแบบยืดหยุ่นอาจเกิดผลกระทบด้านลบมากมายหากมีการปล่อยให้พนักงานมีการทำงานชั่วโมงยาวนานมากเกินไป ซึ่งจะส่งผลเสียต่อทั้งพนักงานและองค์กร ผู้จัดการจะต้องมีส่วนร่วมในวางแผนและกระตุ้นการทำงานของพนักงานเพื่อให้บรรลุเป้าหมายขององค์กร แต่ในขณะเดียวกันก็ต้องดูแลในเรื่องสวัสดิการ การทำงานของพนักงานด้วย นอกจากนี้การทำงานแบบยืดหยุ่นโดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งระหว่างการชะลอตัวทางเศรษฐกิจ นายจ้างได้นำความยืดหยุ่นมาปรับใช้ในการลดค่าใช้จ่าย และเพิ่มรายได้ให้แก่องค์กร ซึ่งนายจ้างแต่ละคนก้จะมีการปรับใช้ความยืดหยุ่นในการทำงานแตกต่างกันออกไปอย่างเช่นVirgin Australia ก้ปรับใช้ความยืดหยุ่นโดยการหยุดจ้างพนักงาน และลดจำนวนพนักงานลง เพื่อลดต้นทุน ในขณะที่KPMG มีการปรับใช้ความยืดหยุ่นโดยการลดจำนวนชั่วโมงการทำงานของพนักงานลง

Results (English) 1:

Therefore, this report agrees with Juliet Bourke that the use of flexibility has moved away from its original paradigm towards new horizons, and specific profits of employers, that change could be avoided. However, it has advantages and disadvantages associated with it, if there is a good deal may lead to an effective work life balance of workersWork-life balance and Flexibility program to benefit the employer and the employee. However, this flexibility has been moved from its original format. Which the employer can benefit from the flexibility of the Shifted. But at the same time, the negative impact was an employee. However, Flex can be a lot of negative consequences if the leave the employee has to work long hours too. This will affect both employees and the organization. Managers will be required to participate in the planning and operation of the employees to achieve the goals of the organization. But at the same time, they must take care of welfare. The work of the employee. In addition, Flex, especially during an economic downturn. The employer has the flexibility to reduce costs and increase revenue to which the employer, each ก้จะมี the deployment flexibility to work differently, such as Virgin Australia. Kop serve by staffing flexibility and reducing the number of employees to reduce costs, while KPMG. There is a deployment flexibility by reducing the number of working hours of employees.

Results (English) 2:

Therefore, this report agrees with Juliet Bourke that the use of flexibility has moved away from its original paradigm towards new horizons, and specific profits of employers, that change could be avoided. However, it has advantages and disadvantages associated with it, if there is. a good Deal May Lead to an effective balance of Workers Work Life Flexibility and Work-Life balance Program provides benefits to employers and employees. However, flexibility has moved from its original form. The Shifted employers can benefit from the flexibility. But in the meantime, have a negative impact on staff currently asleep. However, flexible working may cause many negative side effects if they are letting employees work long hours too. Which will affect both employees and organizations. Managers are required to participate in the planning and encouraging employees to achieve organizational goals. But at the same time take care of the welfare. With employee In addition, flexible working, especially during the economic downturn. Employers have the flexibility to adjust to lower costs. And increase revenue for the organization. Each employer will have to deploy people with the flexibility to work out differences such as Virgin Australia'm deployment flexibility by stopping employees. And reduce headcount To reduce costs while KPMG deployment flexibility by reducing the number of hours worked by employees.

Results (English) 3:

Therefore this report, agrees with Juliet Bourke that the use of flexibility has moved away from its original paradigm. Towards new horizons and specific, profits of employers that change, could be avoided. However it has, advantages and disadvantages. Associated, with it if there is a good deal may lead to an effective work life balance of workers

.Flexibility and work-life balance program benefits employers and employees. However flexibility has moved on from the original form. The employer can benefit from the Shifted of flexibility. But at the same time can have a negative impact and its employees.Which will affect both the employees and the organization. The manager will be involved in planning and motivate employees to achieve the goal of the organization. But at the same time, it must be in charge of the welfare of employees.The employer, the flexibility to serve to reduce costs. , and increase the income of the enterprise. The employers each people do have the flexibility to work differently, such as Virgin Australia.And reduce the number of employees, to reduce the cost, while KPMG is deployed by reducing the number of flexible working hours.