Results (
English) 2:
[Copy]Copied!
Therefore, this report agrees with Juliet Bourke that the use of flexibility has moved away from its original paradigm towards new horizons, and specific profits of employers, that change could be avoided. However, it has advantages and disadvantages associated with it, if there is. a good Deal May Lead to an effective Work Life balance of Workers Flexibility and Work-Life balance Program is beneficial to both the employer and the employee contributes to the benefit of both employers and employees. It has the potential to improve employee morale. Reduce absenteeism and retain. corporate knowledge, especially during the economic downturn; however, the aim of flexibility in lowering costs they sometimes can cause a negative effect on the employee and the organization. The program work-life balance and flexibility to the benefit of employers and employees. However, flexibility has moved from its original form. The Shifted employers can benefit from the flexibility. But in the meantime, have a negative impact on staff currently asleep. However, flexible working may cause many negative side effects if they are letting employees work long hours too. Which will affect both employees and organizations. Managers are required to participate in the planning and encouraging employees to achieve organizational goals. But at the same time take care of the welfare. With employee In addition, flexible working, especially during the economic downturn. Employers have the flexibility to adjust to lower costs. And increase revenue for the organization. Each employer will have to deploy people with the flexibility to work out differences such as Virgin Australia'm deployment flexibility by stopping employees. And reduce headcount To reduce costs while KPMG deployment flexibility by reducing the number of hours worked by employees.
Being translated, please wait..
