but the other side of the privity r

but the other side of the privity rule is that only the person (or company) who actually sold the product can be sued, and this part of the rule remains. If the seller cannot be traced, is bankrupt or otherwise unable to pay damages, the consumer has no claim in contract against anyone else involved in the product’s supply. This rule can also cause hardship to the seller, since it applies even if it was not the seller but the manufacturer who causes the defect.

แต่อีกด้านหนึ่งของกฎ privity เป็นว่ามีเพียงคน (หรือบริษัท) ความเป็นจริงการขายผลิตภัณฑ์สามารถถูกฟ้องและส่วนหนึ่งของการปกครองนี้ยังคงอยู่ หากผู้ขายไม่สามารถตรวจสอบได้เป็นบุคคลล้มละลายหรืออย่างอื่นไม่สามารถที่จะจ่ายค่าความเสียหายให้กับBenny ผู้ที่การเรียกร้องในสัญญากับทุกคนที่เกี่ยวข้องอื่นๆ ในการจัดหาผลิตภัณฑ์ไม่มี กฎข้อนี้ยังสามารถทำให้เกิดความยากลำบากให้แก่ผู้ขายเพราะมันมีผลบังคับใช้ถึงแม้ว่ามันจะไม่ได้เป็นผู้ขาย แต่ผู้ผลิตที่ทำให้เกิดข้อบกพร่อง

Results (English) 1:

but the other side of the privity rule is that only the person (or company) who actually sold the product can be sued, and this part of the rule remains. If the seller cannot be traced, is bankrupt or otherwise unable to pay damages, the consumer has no claim in contract against anyone else involved in the product's supply. This rule can also cause hardship to the seller, since it applies even if it was not the seller but the manufacturer who causes the defect.But on the other side of the privity rule is that the only person (or company) in fact, the product can be sued and the part of this regime still exist. If the seller cannot verify is insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for the damage, with Benny. Those claims in contracts with everyone involved in the supply of a product, there are no. This rule can also cause difficulty to the seller because it is effective even if it is not a vendor. But the manufacturer that caused the fault.

Results (English) 2:

but the other side of the privity rule is that only the person (or company) who actually sold the product can be sued, and this part of the rule remains. If the seller can not be traced, is bankrupt or otherwise unable to pay damages,. the consumer has no claim in contract against anyone else involved in the product's supply. This rule can also cause hardship to the seller, since it applies even if it was not the seller but the manufacturer who causes the defect. But the other side of the law. privity is that only the person (or company) is selling a product can sue and be part of the rule remains. If the seller can not be checked bankrupt or otherwise unable to pay for the damage to Benny. Who claims a contract with anyone other. There are no products to supply This law also makes it harder to sell because it is mandatory, though it is not the seller. But manufacturers that cause birth defects.

Results (English) 3:

But the other side of the privity rule is that only the person (or company) who actually sold the product can, be sued. And this part of the rule remains. If the seller cannot be traced is bankrupt, or otherwise unable to pay damages the consumer,, Has no claim in contract against anyone else involved in the product 's supply. This rule can also cause hardship to the. Seller.Since it applies even if it was not the seller but the manufacturer who causes the defect.

.But on the other side of the rule privity is that only the person (or company) fact selling products can be sued and part of this rule remains.Those who claim in contract with every other in the procurement of products. Rule still can cause difficulty to the seller because it is valid even if มันจะไม่ได้ as a seller.