it was accepted that the blood for

it was accepted that the blood for transfusions was a product for the purposes of the Act. The claimants were all people who had been infected with hepatitis C virus through having transfusions of contaminated blood. The blood had been taken from donors who were infected with the virus; at the time of the transfusions it was known within the medical profession, that there was a risk of passing on the virus that way, though there was no way of testing the blood to make sure it was not contaminated.

มันได้รับการยอมรับว่าการถ่ายเลือดเป็นผลิตภัณฑ์สำหรับวัตถุประสงค์ของพระราชบัญญัติ อะไรก็ตามที่คนทุกคนที่ได้รับการติดเชื้อไวรัสตับอักเสบซีผ่านการถ่ายเลือดที่ปนเปื้อน เลือดที่ได้รับมาจากผู้บริจาคที่มีการติดเชื้อไวรัส; มันเป็นที่รู้จักในอาชีพทางการแพทย์ที่มีความเสี่ยงของการส่งผ่านไวรัสวิธีการที่แม้ว่าจะมีวิธีการทดสอบเลือดเพื่อให้แน่ใจว่ามันก็ไม่ได้มีการปนเปื้อน

Results (English) 1:

it was accepted that the blood for transfusions was a product for the purposes of the Act. The claimants were all people who had been infected with hepatitis C virus through having transfusions of contaminated blood. The blood had been taken from donors who were infected with the virus; at the time of the transfusions it was known within the medical profession, that there was a risk of passing on the virus that way, though there was no way of testing the blood to make sure it was not contaminated.It is accepted that taking blood is a product for the purpose of the Act anything that everyone who has been infected by virus hepatitis c through contaminated blood. Blood obtained from a donor infected with a virus, it is known in the medical profession, with the risk of transmission of the virus that way, although there will be blood test methods to make sure that it is not contaminated.

Results (English) 2:

it was accepted that the blood for transfusions was a product for the purposes of the Act. The claimants were all people who had been infected with hepatitis C virus through having transfusions of contaminated blood. The blood had been taken from donors who were infected with the. virus; at the time of the transfusions it was known within the medical profession, that there was a risk of passing on the virus that way, though there was no way of testing the blood to make sure it was not contaminated. It has been. agree that a blood transfusion is a product for the purposes of the Act. Whatever the people who have been infected with hepatitis C through contaminated blood transfusions. Blood was obtained from donors who were infected with the virus; It is known in the medical profession, the risk of virus transmission that way, though, will have a blood test to make sure it is not contaminated.

Results (English) 3:

It was accepted that the blood for transfusions was a product for the purposes of the Act. The claimants were all people. Who had been infected with hepatitis C virus through having transfusions of contaminated blood. The blood had been taken. From donors who were infected with the virus; at the time of the transfusions it was known within the, medical professionThat there was a risk of passing on the virus, that way though there was no way of testing the blood to make sure it was. Not contaminated.

.It has been recognized that a blood transfusion is the product for the purpose of the law. Whatever one has been through contaminated blood transfusion hepatitis C virus infectionIt is known in the medical profession with the risk of transmission of the virus to although the blood test method to make sure it doesn't have the contamination.