How does it compare with what you h

How does it compare with what you have previously known/ thought about the topic

จากสิ่งที่กล่าวมามันมีความแตกต่างจากสิ่งที่ฉันได้รู้จักมาก่อนหน้านี้ คือแรงจูงใจของคนทำงานส่วนใหญ่คือ เงิน เป็นเหตุผลสำคัญในการทำงาน แม้จะเป็นงานที่ไม่ชอบแต่ถ้าได้ผลตอบแทนสูง พวกเขาก็ยอมจำใจทำงาน มันอาจไม่เป็นผลดีต่อองค์กรตามที่บทความได้ให้ข้อมูลไว้ ซึ่งแสดงให้เห็นว่าการใช้เครื่องมือในการจูงใจเป็นข้อผิดพลาดในการเลือกใช้เมื่อทำงานร่วมกัน ตัวอย่างเช่น เพื่อนของฉันได้งานเป็นผู้ช่วยผู้จัดการทางการตลาด แต่เขาจบด้านทรัพยากรมนุษย์ ซึ่งที่ไม่ตรงตามคุณสมบัติของเขา เขาทำงานเพราะเงินเดือนที่ได้รับสูงกว่าตำแหน่งอื่น แต่ผลงานของเขาก็ไม่ดีเท่าที่ควร ส่งผลให้เป็นภาระของผู้ร่วมงานคนอื่น จะเห็นได้ว่าแรงจูงใจที่ได้จากเครื่องมือในที่นี้คือเงิน เป็นแรงจูงใจให้คนอยากทำงาน แต่ก็ส่งผลกระทบต่อคนอื่น ตามที่บทความแสดงไว้

Results (English) 1:

How does it compare with what you have previously known/ thought about the topicFrom all these, it is different from what I had known previously. Is the motivation of workers, the majority of the money is a major reason to work, even as the job that I don't like, but if they have high yields. They agree to take the necessary mind working it may not be good for the Organization, according to the article, the information which showed that the motivation is in error when it works together. For example, my friend got a job as Assistant Manager of marketing, but he graduated in human resources that do not meet his qualifications. He worked, because the salary is higher than other positions but received his works, it is not as good. As a result, the burden of other people to collaborators, we would see that the motivation from the tool in this is money motivates people to work, but it affects other people, according to the article listed.

Results (English) 2:

How does it compare with what you have previously known / thought about the topic

of what it says is different from what I had known previously. The motivation of working people is the most important reason to work. Even a job is not like I have a high return. They would be unwilling to work. It may not be good for the organization, according to an article provided. Which shows that the use of the tool in persuading a mistake in choosing when to work together, for example, my friend got a job as assistant manager of marketing. But he's human resources Which does not meet his specifications. He worked for salaries that are higher than elsewhere. But his work was not good enough. As a result, the burden of working people. It is seen that the motives of the tool in this money. As an incentive for people to work. But it affects others. According to the article shown

Results (English) 3:

How does it compare with what you have previously known / thought about the topic.From what has been said Maman is different from what I have known earlier. Is the motive of the workers most is money, that is the main reason in the work. It"s not if you get high returns, they would get to work. It may not be beneficial to the organization as an article for information. Which shows that the use of tools of persuasion is error in the choice of when to work together. For example, my friend got a job as a marketing assistant He graduated in human resources. Which does not meet his properties. He works because the salary was higher than other positions. But his work was not as good as it should be. The burden of staff people. It can be seen that the motivation from the here is the money. Motivate people to work, but also affects other articles are listed.