ฉันทำแครอทของคุณตื่น

ฉันทำแครอทของคุณตื่น

Results (English) 1:

I woke up your carrots

Results (English) 2:

I woke you up.

Results (English) 3:

14 In accordance with his usual practice, lie unloaded the two lower decks and commenced unloading the third deck of the crate. The fixed rump at the feed lot was only the height of the second deck of the crate. Consequently, it was necessary to lower a rainp flour the back right hand side of the third deck onto the second deck to enable the sheep on the tliirddeck to exit the crate via the fixed ramp. There was a winch on the back of the track for the purpose of lowering the rump. In accordance with his and industry practice the plaintiff accessed the winch by climbing up the back of the trailer. In order to unload the sheep it was also necessary to climb the sides of the crate to verbally direct the sheep and lus dog and to prod and push the sheep towards the rear of the trailer. This was also standard industry practice.15 The sides of the crate are comprised of horizontal slats and vertical stru.ts. At the level of the flooring of each deck there are slats of substantial width, known as kick plates. The sides of each deck linve tWO narrower horizontal slats above the kick plates. The height of each deck is 3. 1 inches. Mr Cavanagh used the slats and kick plates to climb up and along the sides of the crate. This again is standard industry practice. He was not supported by any external platform whilst doing this and neither did he wear a harness. Exteninl platforms and harnesses were not in use in the industry, at all, at tins tune.16 Mr Cavanagh unloaded the right hand side of the third deck of the trailer. He then moved to the left handside and commenced unloading what is known as the silly pen. ten is used throughout the industryto refer to the pen at the rear of the left hand side of the third deck. It is refeiTed to as the silly pen because the peculiar nature of tins pen is tlint inorder to unload the sheep from it it is necessary to get them to move forward towards the centre of the crate to exit the pen through its gate.The sheep their linve to do a U tuni and exit the crnte via the rainp at the rear of the iight hand side of the trailer. It is difficult to persuade the sheep in the silly pen to execute these manoeuvres as they can see the other sheep exiting at the back of the trailer and therefore they want to leave the silly pen through the rear of the silly pen and not by way of a gate in the centre of the body of the tuck.17 Mr Cavanagh unloaded all but two of the sheep flour the silly pen. The fiiinl two sheep would not come out and his dog, who was tired, couldnot persuade them to move in the iiglit direction. The plaintiff climbed up the left linnd side of the crnte and stood on a slat along side the silly pen. He unsuccessfully used the prodder to try and persuade the sheep to move.la The plaintiff had lus feet on the kick plate or a horizontal slat forming part of the side of the second deck crate and his hands were on a higher slat beside the silly pen. He moved backwards and forwards along the slats. When lie was unsuccessful in moving the sheep with the prodder, the plaintiff opened a gate which was on the outside of the silly pen and coinpiised part of the side of the crate. He leaned through the open gate into the silly pen. His waist was about level with the floor of the silly pen. This meant that his feet were approximately 2.5 metres from the groimd. He successfully pushed one of the sheep out of the silly pen. He then reached for the second sheep and it turned and charged at liim He saw the sheep charging when it was about two and a linlf feet away front him. He put lits head down to protect Ins face. The sheep pushed the plaintiff off the side of the crate and lie fell to the ground. The next thing the plaintiff recalled was the moment before lie liit the ground. At tlint point he tinned to lits left and he hit the ground on his left side. The plaintiff recalls that his left foot fii’st hit the ground and lits right foot trailed lits left. He said "he was going ai’ound onto” his left shoulder. The sheep did not fall front the crate.19 The plaintiff was in considerable pain and was writhing on the bitumen. He was moved away from his tuck and someone put liiui into a coma position. He waited for appi’oxiinately 20 inmutes until an ambulance arrived. He was in considerable pain and felt like his head wasaboiit to explode. He does not loiow if he lost consciousness. His left foot was causing considerable pain. He told Mr Syniiugton, a driver who had come to his aid immediately after the fall, that he lind hurt his back and head. Mr Syiningtoii noticed a bit of blood on Ins head but no obvious wound.2o The plaintiff was taken to Kojonnp Hospital where his left ankle was plastered. He was discharged and went home. That same night he went to Albany Hospital and lus ankle was operated on the following day. The issues relating to Ins mjiuies will be dealt with later in this judgment.2i The plaintiff had not received any insmiction or training as to the safe syst