Results (
English) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
Australia is, by international standards, a safe country with low levels of crime, althoughviolent and non-violent crime does occur. Australia has a law-abiding culture, and crimeagainst any person—particularly against international students, who are our guests—isunacceptable to most Australians and certainly to all Australian governments.International students may be at risk from criminal behaviour, as are all people living inAustralia or anywhere in the world. Students may, however, be at greater risk than mostAustralians if they are unfamiliar with local danger spots and ways to minimise the risk ofbeing assaulted; if they have to travel alone late at night because of work and studycommitments; and if they need to travel through high-risk areas.Governments cannot guarantee that international students will not be victims of crime. Butgovernments are developing initiatives involving police, education providers, localcommunities and international students to minimise the extra risks students may face. Theyalso ensure that international students receive the full support of law enforcement agenciesand the justice system if they become victims of crime.Although Australia is renowned for safety, according to the international standard, with low levels of crime, but because the occurrence of certain actions of violence against students, India. Make believe in security for international students is one of the factors that affect the rate of the number of international students. Cause and effect of global changes.Australia is reputation as a safe destination for international student but some act of violence being perpetrated on Indian students that has been some questions to international studentHow do organizations implement downsizing?Three forms of implementation strategies havebeen identified; workforce reduction, organization redesign, and systemic strategies (Farell &Mavondo, 2004). First, the workforce reductionstrategy concentrates on the reduction of theoverall number of employees, including layoffs,retrenchments, natural attritions, early retirements,hiring freezes, golden parachutes, and buyoutpackages. This strategy is commonly implementedin a reactive manner as a cost-cutting measure(Ryan & Macky, 1998), yet has shown to be rarelysuccessful. Second, the organization redesignstrategy focuses on eliminating work and includesactivities, such as abolishing functions, eliminatinghierarchical levels, redesigning tasks, andconsolidating units (Farell & Mavondo, 2004).Third, the systemic strategy assumes a moreholistic and macro view focusing on changing theorganizationís intrinsic culture and the attitudes andvalues of its employees (Luthans & Sommer,1999). Studies have shown that most firms haveresorted to workforce reduction strategiesTo reduce the organization consists of three forms of strategy in the operation. The design specified; reducing workforce and organization of complex systems (strategy & farell. Mavondo, 2004), workforce reduction The strategy focuses on reducing the The total number of employees including discharge, Retrenchments, nature, public, attritions It employed the golden parachute and a solid loan Package. This strategy is often used in a way that is. (Ryan & expense-cutting measures provided by Maggie, 1998) also showed a rare. Success stories Second, the organization aims to eliminate the jobs strategy design. And includes activities such as to cancel the function. Hierarchy level and job design. Integration (farell & mavondo, 2004). 3 strategy system is considered greater than. Holistic and focuses on changing the macro view Í s organization. Culture and attitudes and values of employees (solution than. Fun & Merry, 1999) has shown that most companies have a strategy for reducing labor.
Being translated, please wait..