เว็บไซต์นี้จะดีกว่า google สำหรับกา

เว็บไซต์นี้จะดีกว่า google สำหรับการแปลTotal concentration of major carotenoid (TC) in the test diets are presented
in Table 2. The treatment diets were designed to achieve a target level of
25 mg/kg for in each experimental diet, while the unsupplemented control
diet contained 5.70 ± 0.27 mg/kg of carotenoids on a dry weight basis.
The dominant carotenoids in the test diets were lutein and β-carotene. The
retention factor (Rf) averaged 0.19, 0.22, and 0.19, identical to the lutein
standard in tea, mulberry, and cassava leaves, respectively. The least polar
zone had an Rf average at 0.98, 0.98, and 0.96 identical to a β-carotene
standard. Lutein content was 20.14 ± 0.79, 18.49 ± 1.45, 15.57 ± 1.42, 11.68
± 1.16, 10.93 ± 1.51, 11.66 ± 0.99, and 2.58 ± 0.55 mg/kg, respectively,
and β-carotene was 10.21 ± 1.19, 9.19 ± 1.05, 10.23 ± 1.00, 9.86 ± 1.14,
7.28 ± 0.78, 9.53 ± 1.57, and 2.28 ± 0.28 mg/kg, respectively.

Results (English) 1:

This site is better than google for translation of major carotenoid concentration Total (TC) are presented in the test diets.in Table 2. The treatment diets were designed to achieve a target level of25 mg/kg for in each experimental diet, while the unsupplemented controldiet contained 5.70 ± 0.27 mg/kg of carotenoids on a dry weight basis.The dominant carotenoids in the test diets were lutein and β-carotene. Theretention factor (Rf) averaged 0.19, 0.22, and 0.19, identical to the luteinstandard in tea, mulberry, and cassava leaves, respectively. The least polarzone had an Rf average at 0.98, 0.98, and 0.96 identical to a β-carotenestandard. Lutein content was 20.14 ± 0.79, 18.49 ± 1.45, 15.57 ± 1.42, 11.68± 1.16, 10.93 ± 1.51, 11.66 ± 0.99, and 2.58 ± 0.55 mg/kg, respectively,and β-carotene was 10.21 ± 1.19, 9.19 ± 1.05, 10.23 ± 1.00, 9.86 ± 1.14,7.28 ± 0.78, 9.53 ± 1.57, and 2.28 ± 0.28 mg/kg, respectively.

Results (English) 2:

This is better than google translate for Total. Major concentration of carotenoid (TC) in the Test diets are Presented
in Table 2. The Treatment diets were designed to Target Achieve a level of
25 mg / kg for in each experimental diet, while the Control unsupplemented
diet Contained 12:27 a.m. ± 5.70 mg / kg. of carotenoids on a Dry weight basis.
The Dominant carotenoids in the Test diets were lutein and beta-carotene. The
retention factor (Rf) averaged .19, 12:22 a.m., and 0:19, identical to the lutein
standard in Tea, mulberry, and cassava leaves,. respectively. The Least Polar
Zone had an Rf average at 0.98, 0.98, and 0.96 identical to a beta-carotene
standard. Lutein content was 20:14 ± 0.79, six forty-nine p.m. ± 1:45, 15.57 ± 1:42, 11.68
± 1:16, 10.93 ± one fifty-one, 11.66 ±. 0.99, and two fifty-eight ± 12:55 a.m. mg / kg, respectively,
and beta-carotene was ten twenty-one ± 1.19, nine nineteen ± 1.05, 10:23 ± 1:00, 9.86 ± 01.14,
7:28 ± 0.78, nine fifty-three ± 1.57, and 28/02 ± 0.28 mg / kg, respectively. .

Results (English) 3:

This site is better Google for translation Total concentration of major carotenoid (TC) in the test diets are presented.In Table 2. The treatment diets were designed to achieve a target level of.25 mg / kg for in each, experimental diet while the unsupplemented control.Diet contained 5.70 edge 0.27 mg / kg of carotenoids on a dry weight basis.The dominant carotenoids in the test diets were lutein and β - carotene. The.Retention factor (Rf), averaged 0.19 0.22 and, to, 0.19 identical the lutein.Standard in tea mulberry and cassava,,, leaves respectively. The least polar.Zone had an Rf average, at 0.98 0.98 and 0.96, identical to a β - carotene.Standard. Lutein content was 20.14 edge, edge 1.45 0.79 18.49, convert, 15.57 1.42 11.68.Edge, edge 1.51 1.16 10.93, edge, edge 11.66 0.99 and 2.58 0.55 mg / kg respectively,,And β - carotene was 10.21 edge, edge, 1.19 9.19 1.05 10.23 1.00 9.86 1.14, edge, edge7.28 edge, edge, 0.78 9.53 1.57 and 2.28 edge 0.28 mg / kg respectively,.